Looking out over the canyon at Grutas de Tolantongo, Hidalgo from one of the chapoteadores or “infinity pools” at the the uppermost hotel in the resort complex. The famous Grutas de Tolantongo are at the bottom of the canyon.
We rarely inquire about a commodity’s origins in wage labor. This is especially true of restaurant meals and resort vacations. Our enjoyment might be undercut were we confronted, for example, with the stifling heat and indignity borne at Disneyland by the person in the Mickey Mouse suit. The suit’s fixed smile compels its wearer to endure tail-pulling by pre-teens lest the spell of “being with Mickey” is broken and a refund is demanded. So when those who profit from selling commodities conceal the exploitation in their relations of production, we consumers usually ratify their act by a willed ignorance. We don’t want to know how our “vacation” is produced! Problem is: there doesn’t seem to be any alternative to this collective self-deception around commodities
Friends had recommended Grutas Tolantongo, in Hidalgo state just north of the State of Mexico, solely as a resort. However, on two recent visits, we also came to be inspired by its democratic relations of production. Up to a point.
The large resort is made up of three hotel complexes that descend the side of a steep box canyon. Its main attraction is a steamy grotto at the bottom of the canyon’s enclosed end. Flowing from this grotto is a small, clear thermal river. The open grotto chamber is half the size of a tennis court and has a ceiling up to 10 feet high. Rocks sculpted over centuries make seats near the mouth for receiving the river’s caresses. Inside, waterfalls offer natural massages that are both vigorous and soothing. Outside, dozens of other waterfalls flow from the canyon’s heights, steaming in the morning sun. “The tunnel,” a small cavern 15 meters deep just above the grotto, offers its own warm showers. The slope is dressed in poinsettia and cactus. A kilometer up it still more warm falls start their descent to the river. While to the eye the drama of all these features is striking, the body immersed in them absorbs nature at her most gentle and reassuring.
Our trips were mid-week, free of Mexico City crowds. An absence of hierarchy in the staff – rare at resorts – struck us. Desk managers and waitresses all dressed with the same informality. (And almost all of the men wore moustaches.) Why? The resort turns out to be a “cooperativa ejidal” run democratically by its 112 members or “socios”!
Sociedad Cooperativa Ejidal “Grutas Tolantongo” SCL (www.grutastolantongo.com.mx), about 3 hours drive from Mexico City, was formed some 30 years ago by members of the ejido that owns the side of the canyon described above. Not all members of the 5200 hectare ejido are in the co-op, but all socios must be ejidatarios. Ejidos are a form of land tenure set up in the 1930s in response to a cry for “Land and Freedom.” The 1910 revolution demanded restoration of communal lands that had been taken from campesinos after Independence and made into haciendas. Article 27 of the 1917 constitution had declared that every campesino has a right to land. But in 1992, to join NAFTA, then-President Salinas de Gortari stealthily passed a modification that legally undermined ejidos by allowing sale to corporations. While entire ejidos have since been sold, the new permission is widely ignored. While many ejidos have passed into the hands of agribusiness, most ejidal land remains intact. Tolantongo’s “cooperativa ejjidal” illustrates one way ejidos can retain control of their land.
Rooms are simple and inexpensive: 400 pesos for one with a double bed, bath, and terrace (with smashing view); 600 for 2 double beds. The elite are absent. This is a resort for workers, by workers. Of the resort’s three levels, only two are in easy walking distance. A riverside café de olla on a brisk morning is worth the 178 steps.
Socios are divided by family: each family gets one vote. A family’s vote is exercised by its head. Here our admiration became qualified. Among the 112 socios, our dinner waitress told us there are only two women heads of household. We suggested to a 40-year-old male socio that wives who work in the co-op should also have a voice. “But they do,” he explained, “through their husbands – who are in any case more important.” The wives we asked about it did not consider themselves members. This paradox of sustaining a co-op with the labor of women, while denying them votes, was glaring to us. Since the paradox reflects overall gender relations it is invisible. Why didn’t the co-op principle of engaging all talents in a workforce extend to enfranchising females? Roughly 30 male contract workers also get mere wages, never a share of profits or a vote; not being ejidatarios, they are also collectively exploited by socios. We could not complain. In our country, the USA, with the exception of some 500 worker co-ops and democratic ESOPs, no enterprises make any pretense of running themselves democratically.
Up near the rim we happened on the chapoteaderos or splashing pools. Fed by warm springs and shaded among trees, a descending series of about twenty-five of these semi-circular “infinity” pools look out over a vastness. ln New Yorker ads this vastness is the ocean. Here it is the canyon, at once huge and intimate. The pools of various sizes constitute the upper hotel’s main amenity. We loved soaking in their warm spring water, elbows resting on wet edges, gazing over the canyon. Socios had themselves thought of the chapoteadores, our friend Pablo (Francisco) Rebolledo Pérez insisted; professionals merely executed their vision. Pablo, joined by his daughter Nayret, tended the front desk and consented to be interviewed on our return. Tolantongo takes no reservations by phone so we paid half of our next visit to Pablo’s associate Luis Avalos.
Perhaps because we had widely praised the co-op, we received an extra-warm welcome on returning. We were greeted by Vasily Ramirez and his associate Simon, who ran the store. Having brought our bags to our rooms, Vasily surprised us by asking to borrow our car. Inspired by the spirit of the place, we gave him the keys. In an hour he returned them. It felt like a sort of test.
The next morning, before the city crowds arrived, we interviewed Pablo over still more barbacoa, serenaded this time by a wonderful local close-harmony group. “The grandfathers” had had the vision, Pablo said, and had started building the resort in the late 1970s. Most socios were members of three or four large families, he said. There are no professional managers. Minor income differences based on responsibilities had been allowed by the General Assembly, but such jobs rotated. Democracy is the key, he said.
It was important to Pablo – and other socios with whom we spoke – that neither outside capital nor expertise nor government help had launched or sustained the project. The first 5 simple units started generating income in 1992. These in turn raised funds for 10 more, and so on. “We don’t even save in a bank; we reinvest everything. Everyone must work every day,” Pablo explained. Slackers lose rights one at a time until the ejidatario is no longer a socio. Slow self-capitalization has allowed socios to acquire business skills and thereby to preserve their collective autonomy.
Socios were proud of two results. Living standards have begun to rise – a rise the co-op had made uniform for all income levels. And virtually all young people who had gone to the US for work have returned to join in the cooperative.
Since 1992 and NAFTA privatizing and cooperativizing are two diverging options for ejidatarios. We had seen ejidatarios on Mexico’s West coast sell long leases to developers and foreign corporations only to become servants on their own land. Because Tolantongo ejidatarios slowly developed their land themselves, they welcomed visitors as its owners and prospered accordingly. Similarly the Opichen ejido near Yucatan’s Uxmal ruins had also formed the Chac Lol co-op of local tortillerias with help from our friends in the cooperative movement, Rommel Gonzalez and Esther Munoz. Since co-op socios retain all profits, Chac Lol and Tolantongo had rejected exploitation in their relations of production. However, when the Yucatan ejidos attempted a cooperative restaurant-hotel with large outside grants it went bankrupt, since the socios had not developed the needed business skills over a long period of self-capitalization (www.ced.ca/yucatan.htm).
The Chilcuautla agricultural co-ops near Tolantongo could be suppliers (www.globaljusticecenter.org/articles/coop_hidalgoESP.htm). A strong argument for such “inter-cooperation” is that in isolation successful co-ops risk co-optation by ambient capitalism. As discovered by the Amana co-ops in Iowa and plywood co-ops in the Pacific Northwest, co-ops can so boost their own value that members are tempted by buy-out offers and fail to pass the co-op to their children. Is Tolantongo a model response to NAFTAs effects? So far, we’d say yes. Over decades it has built an alternative economy on new democratic relations of production and it is prospering. Those relations and that prosperity can endure and spread if co-ops like Tolantongo connect with the wider “social economy” movement.
Jobs rotate yearly. In 2006 Pablo had collected entry fees at the gate. Eighty pesos admits one to all facilities for 24 hours. Socios pay no entry fee but get no break on rooms. The co-op covers all federal health services and gives stipends to retirees. “We make sure everyone enjoys the increases in living standards because we need everyone’s work,” Pablo explained. Given this universal need, we felt that sooner or later a socio’s daughter, educated on co-op income, would make such a contribution that the paradox of excluding her from voting would be too visible to go unresolved.
Having had chambermaid and waiting jobs, we understand George Orwell’s account of the strong feelings generated behind the scenes in workers who produce the pleasures offered by restaurant and resort owners. In the kitchen of an elegant restaurant described in Down and Out in London and Paris, those feelings were epitomized by garnishing soups for obnoxious customers with spit. Tolantongo is the reverse. Neither its workers nor its owners are not ashamed of the exploitative relations of production that bind them, because the workers are the owners and there is no exploitation. Indeed, visitors’ knowledge that its soul is a free bond that replaces the usual coercion of employees by bosses, is among the pleasures of the place. More explicit sharing this pride with visitors would benefit Tolantongo as well as the co-op movement. Repeated studies show consumers trust cooperatives more than they do investor-owned firms.
So there is an alternative! Cases like Tolantongo are not everywhere, and they take lots of collective work, but their sheer existence is evidence that there is an alternative to the willed ignorance of how commodities are produced. It establishes that exploitation-free relations of production are possible after all. For in that canyon those relations are, or could be made to be, almost as beautiful as the place.
Along with Cliff DuRand, in 2004 the authors founded the Center for Global Justice in San Miguel de Allende, Mexico (www.globaljusticecenter.org).